Hi, First of all, if you don't need ranges, you should use IgniteAtomicLong instead of the sequence. But you should keep in mind that updating the atomic long is actually the same as updating the same cache entry, so you acquire an exclusive write lock each time you do this. That's why sequence is much faster - it doesn't do any distributed operations within a reserved range. If you need performance, you should revisit your approach and try using sequences with larger ranges.
-Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/AtomicSequence-not-performing-well-with-2-nodes-cluster-set-up-tp9208p9237.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
