Hello Patrick, Do you really need to persist to both MySQL and Ignite Persistence? Is it possible to settle on one of the disk storages only?
-- Denis On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:36 AM PatrickEgli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > We're interested in using Apache Ignite for our next project. Our goal is > to > write an API with high performance and a high availability on a huge data > set. In order to get a solid unterstanding of Apache Ignite we've read the > documentation. > > Our first plan was to use MySQL together with Apache Ignite Persistence. > Today we saw that Ignite cannot guarantee consistency between native > persistence and 3rd party persistence. 3rd Party Persistence > < > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/3rd-party-store#section-using-3rd-party-persistence-together-with-ignite-persistence> > > > Consistency is a really important part for our project. So the 3rd party > persistence approache is probably the wrong feature for us. > > Beside the 3rd party persistence we think about Hibernate L2 cache. Could > this feature be better for us? > > What would you recommend us? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best regards > Patrick > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >
