Hi, the GC logs where also provided and we determined, there was no GC
pressure. At least what I understood from the thread above. We also enabled
some extra thread info for GC and that showed nothing also.

On the client side I also see this: Possible too long JVM pause: 25468
milliseconds. My SERVER heap size is at -Xmx3g and I even tried -Xmx2g My
client is at 1G
1- So the SERVER node is stopped because the client was misbehaving?
2- clientFailureDetectionTimeout should be set on all nodes including the
client?

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 11:14, Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Well, this is the relevant part:
> [22:26:21,816][WARNING][jvm-pause-detector-worker][IgniteKernal%xxxxxx] 
> *Possible
> too long JVM pause: 55705 milliseconds*.
> [22:26:21,827][WARNING][tcp-disco-client-message-worker-#10%xxxxxx%][TcpDiscoverySpi]
> Client node considered as unreachable and will be dropped from cluster,
> because no metrics update messages received in interval:
> TcpDiscoverySpi.clientFailureDetectionTimeout() ms. It may be caused by
> network problems or long GC pause on client node, try to increase this
> parameter. [nodeId=b07182d0-bf70-4318-9fe3-d7d5228bd6ef,
> clientFailureDetectionTimeout=30000]
> [22:26:21,839][WARNING][tcp-disco-client-message-worker-#12%xxxxxx%][TcpDiscoverySpi]
> Client node considered as unreachable and will be dropped from cluster,
> because no metrics update messages received in interval:
> TcpDiscoverySpi.clientFailureDetectionTimeout() ms. It may be caused by
> network problems or long GC pause on client node, try to increase this
> parameter. [nodeId=302cff60-b88d-40da-9e12-b955e6bf973d,
> clientFailureDetectionTimeout=30000]
> [22:26:21,847][SEVERE][ttl-cleanup-worker-#48%xxxxxx%][G] Blocked
> system-critical thread has been detected. This can lead to cluster-wide
> undefined behaviour [threadName=partition-exchanger, blockedFor=57s]
> [22:26:21,850][INFO][tcp-disco-sock-reader-#4%xxxxxx%][TcpDiscoverySpi]
> Finished serving remote node connection [rmtAddr=/xxx.xxx.xxx.63:51827,
> rmtPort=51827
> [22:26:21,933][WARNING][ttl-cleanup-worker-#48%xxxxxx%][G] Thread
> [name="exchange-worker-#43%xxxxxx%", id=89, state=TIMED_WAITING,
> blockCnt=6, waitCnt=486312]
>     Lock
> [object=java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@491d897d,
> ownerName=null, ownerId=-1]
>
> Long GC will cause node to segment.
>
> Try either decreasing heap size / making sure full GC does not happen, or
> increase failureDetectionTimeout (clientFailureDetectionTimeout if set) on
> all nodes.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> вт, 29 окт. 2019 г. в 18:02, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi, in my original post I had included full logs of the stopped node...
>>
>> And when you say set to localhost you which property do you mean is it
>> the one IgniteConfiguration setLocalhost()?
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 03:48, Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I think it is possible (such as, node tries to connect to wrong address
>>> / itself) but more detailed analysis of logs is needed.
>>>
>>> You can try specifying localHost property in IgniteConfiguration to make
>>> sure correct address is used.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>
>>>
>>> пн, 28 окт. 2019 г. в 23:16, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Ok cool. Thanks. I'm just trying to figure scenarios where it may
>>>> happen.
>>>>
>>>> When I connect with ignite visor and run the "top" topology command.
>>>> The client node is bound to multiple addresses about 12...
>>>>
>>>> Ignite is running on plain regular VMs while the client node is running
>>>> in a containerized env but using host network (which is regular VM).
>>>>
>>>> So wondering if that would also screw it up something, by trying to
>>>> connect to one of those multiple addresses?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Ilya Kasnacheev <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, if nodes can't reach each other, eventually they may segment and
>>>>> stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> пт, 25 окт. 2019 г. в 00:08, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible this is somehow causing the issue of the node stopping?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 11:24, Ilya Kasnacheev <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This likely means that you have reachability problems in your
>>>>>>> cluster, such as, xxx.xxx.xxx.68 can connect to xxx.xxx.xxx.82 (on
>>>>>>> range 47100-47200) but not the other way around.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> пн, 21 окт. 2019 г. в 19:36, John Smith <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I also see this printing every few seconds on my client
>>>>>>>> application...
>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.spi.communication.tcp.TcpCommunicationSpi Accepted
>>>>>>>> incoming communication connection [locAddr=/xxx.xxx.xxx.68:47101,
>>>>>>>> rmtAddr=/xxx.xxx.xxx.82:49816
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 12:04, John Smith <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, thanks. I already made sure that each ignite VM runs on a
>>>>>>>>> separate host within our cloud. I'm not doing any of that migration 
>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also recently disabled metrics igniteConfig
>>>>>>>>> .setMetricsLogFrequency(0); Just to make sure it doesn't get too
>>>>>>>>> chatty. But i doubt this would affect it...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Should I maybe set the node timeout a bit higher then 30 seconds
>>>>>>>>> maybe put it to 60 seconds? I remember people suggesting this but not
>>>>>>>>> sure...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 06:09, Denis Mekhanikov <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The following documentation page has some useful points on
>>>>>>>>>> deployment in a virtualised environment:
>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/vmware-deployment
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2019, 17:41 +0300, John Smith <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok I have metribeat running on the VM hopefully I will see
>>>>>>>>>> something...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 05:09, Denis Mekhanikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are no long pauses in the GC logs, so it must be the whole
>>>>>>>>>>> VM pause.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 Oct 2019, 23:07 +0300, John Smith <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry here is the gc logs for all 3 machines:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/chbbxigahd4v9di/gc-logs.zip?dl=0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 15:49, John Smith <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, so it happened again here is my latest gc.log stats:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gceasy.io/diamondgc-report.jsp?oTxnId_value=a215d573-d1cf-4d53-acf1-9001432bb28e
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything seems ok to me. I also have Elasticsearch Metricbeat
>>>>>>>>>>>> running, the CPU usage looked normal at the time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 13:05, Denis Mekhanikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, I don’t.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can ask the VM vendor or the cloud provider (if you use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any) for a proper tooling or logs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make sure, that there is no such step in the VM’s lifecycle
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that makes it freeze for a minute.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also make sure that the physical CPU is not overutilized and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no VMs that run on it are starving.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Oct 2019, 19:03 +0300, John Smith <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>, wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know of any good tools I can use to check the VM?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 11:38, Denis Mekhanikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Dennis, so are you saying I should enable GC logs + the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> safe point logs as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having safepoint statistics in your GC logs may be useful, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I recommend enabling them for troubleshooting purposes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check the lifecycle of your virtual machines. There is a high
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chance that the whole machine is frozen, not just the Ignite 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Oct 2019, 18:25 +0300, John Smith <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>, wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dennis, so are you saying I should enable GC logs + the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> safe point logs as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 11:22, John Smith <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, it is running in a VM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 10:11, Denis Mekhanikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are the following messages in the logs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [22:26:21,816][WARNING][jvm-pause-detector-worker][IgniteKernal%xxxxxx]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Possible too long JVM pause: *55705 milliseconds*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [22:26:21,847][SEVERE][ttl-cleanup-worker-#48%xxxxxx%][G]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blocked system-critical thread has been detected. This can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster-wide undefined behaviour 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [threadName=partition-exchanger,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blockedFor=*57s*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the JVM was paused for almost a minute. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn’t seem to be caused by a garbage collection, since there 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of GC pressure in the GC log. Usually such big pauses 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtualised environments when backups are captured from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines or they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just don’t have enough CPU time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at safepoint statistics may also reveal some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting details. You can learn about safepoints here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://blog.gceasy.io/2016/12/22/total-time-for-which-application-threads-were-stopped/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Oct 2019, 23:14 +0300, John Smith <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>, wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the error sais to set clientFailureDetectionTimeout=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1- Do I put a higher value than 30000?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2- Do I do it on the client or the server nodes or all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3- Also if a client is misbehaving why shutoff the server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 21:02, John Smith <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if it's the client node that's failing why is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server node stopping? I'm pretty sure we do verry simple put 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations. All the client nodes are started as client=true
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu., Oct. 3, 2019, 4:18 p.m. Denis Magda, <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see any GC pressure or STW pauses either. If not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GC then it might have been caused by a network glitch or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some long-running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation started by the app. These logs statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [22:26:21,827][WARNING][tcp-disco-client-message-worker-#10%xxxxxx%][TcpDiscoverySpi]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Client node considered as unreachable and will be dropped 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from cluster,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because no metrics update messages received in interval:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TcpDiscoverySpi.clientFailureDetectionTimeout() ms. It may 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network problems or long GC pause on client node, try to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increase this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameter. [nodeId=b07182d0-bf70-4318-9fe3-d7d5228bd6ef,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clientFailureDetectionTimeout=30000]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [22:26:21,839][WARNING][tcp-disco-client-message-worker-#12%xxxxxx%][TcpDiscoverySpi]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Client node considered as unreachable and will be dropped 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from cluster,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because no metrics update messages received in interval:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TcpDiscoverySpi.clientFailureDetectionTimeout() ms. It may 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network problems or long GC pause on client node, try to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increase this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameter. [nodeId=302cff60-b88d-40da-9e12-b955e6bf973d,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clientFailureDetectionTimeout=30000]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [22:26:21,847][SEVERE][ttl-cleanup-worker-#48%xxxxxx%][G]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blocked system-critical thread has been detected. This can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster-wide undefined behaviour 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [threadName=partition-exchanger,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blockedFor=57s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22:26:21,954][SEVERE][ttl-cleanup-worker-#48%xxxxxx%][]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to configured
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout=0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super=AbstractFailureHandler
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ignoredFailureTypes=[SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failureCtx=FailureContext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, err=class 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o.a.i.IgniteException: GridWorker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [name=partition-exchanger, igniteInstanceName=xxxxxx, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finished=false,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heartbeatTs=1568931981805]]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:50 AM John Smith <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I have been monitoring my node and the same one seems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to stop once in a while.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/7n5qfsl5uyi1obt/ignite-logs.zip?dl=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have attached the GC logs and the ignite logs. From
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what I see from gc.logs I don't see big pauses. I could be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The machine is 16GB and I have the configs here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/hkv38s3vce5a4sk/ignite-config.xml?dl=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are the JVM settings...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if [ -z "$JVM_OPTS" ] ; then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     JVM_OPTS="-Xms2g -Xmx2g -server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JVM_OPTS="$JVM_OPTS -XX:+UseG1GC -verbose:gc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -XX:+PrintGCDetails -Xloggc:/var/log/apache-ignite/gc.log"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JVM_OPTS="${JVM_OPTS} -Xss16m"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to