True, but given that replicated caches have readFromBackup = true is that significant? Feels like it's a much easier and safer option than trying to write your own affinity function.
> On 31 Mar 2020, at 16:28, Evgenii Zhuravlev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stephen, > > Even for Replicated cache, part of the partitions will be primary on one node > and other on another node. So, I think it's possible to create a custom > affinity function here. > > Best Regards, > Evgenii > > вт, 31 мар. 2020 г. в 00:20, Stephen Darlington > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > If you have enough memory to store all your data on a single machine, you can > just use a replicated cache. > > Otherwise, you can use a partitioned cache and use “affinity” to make sure > the data you need in a single transaction is located on a single machine. > > Regards, > Stephen > > > On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:17, eerick <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > Is there a way I can configure a 2-node cluster as primary/standby mode, > > i.e., ALL DATA stores primarily on 1 node and be replicated to backup node. > > When primary goes down, backup node picks up. > > > > I wanna setup like that because I have a lot of cross-node transactions and > > I tested that it has higher throughput on single than 2 nodes. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > eerick > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ > > <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/>
