Stephen, It works for reads, but I assume that there write operations: > I have a lot of cross-node transactions
Evgenii вт, 31 мар. 2020 г. в 09:09, Stephen Darlington < [email protected]>: > True, but given that replicated caches have readFromBackup = true is that > significant? Feels like it's a much easier and safer option than trying to > write your own affinity function. > > On 31 Mar 2020, at 16:28, Evgenii Zhuravlev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Stephen, > > Even for Replicated cache, part of the partitions will be primary on one > node and other on another node. So, I think it's possible to create a > custom affinity function here. > > Best Regards, > Evgenii > > вт, 31 мар. 2020 г. в 00:20, Stephen Darlington < > [email protected]>: > >> If you have enough memory to store all your data on a single machine, you >> can just use a replicated cache. >> >> Otherwise, you can use a partitioned cache and use “affinity” to make >> sure the data you need in a single transaction is located on a single >> machine. >> >> Regards, >> Stephen >> >> > On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:17, eerick <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Dear all, >> > >> > Is there a way I can configure a 2-node cluster as primary/standby mode, >> > i.e., ALL DATA stores primarily on 1 node and be replicated to backup >> node. >> > When primary goes down, backup node picks up. >> > >> > I wanna setup like that because I have a lot of cross-node transactions >> and >> > I tested that it has higher throughput on single than 2 nodes. >> > >> > Thanks & Regards, >> > eerick >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >> > > >
