Thanks for your replies ... I know this was an unrealistic scenario but I needed some throughput measures for such a situation.
Having said that I then went for the option of modifying the source code to simulate this situation thus removing any need for special tweaking of the JMeter test. Thanks anyway for the help. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Deepak Shetty <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd probably take a look at what you are trying to do - 30 "real" users > wouldnt synchronize access - > and if you expect your app to do the synchronizing then no further action > should be needed from Jmeter. > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:51 AM, ruthm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to set up the following scenario using JMeter? > > > > I have 30 users browsing through a site at the same time - I use a > > threadgroup with 30 threads to do that. > > > > There is then one particular http request which i want to synchronize > such > > that only one user can carry out that request at a time. Is there any > > controller that allows me to do this? > > > > Thanks > > Ruth > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Allowing-only-one-thread-to-make-a-request-at-a-time-tp5537163p5537163.html > > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
