>I needed  some throughput measures for such a situation.
If you make requests serially then your throughput is the same as that for
a single user :).

>I then went for the option of modifying the source code to simulate this
situation
You mean the source code of your app? and unless this is the version of the
code that will finally be deployed it doesnt make sense.

regards
deepak

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Ruth Mizzi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for your replies ... I know this was an unrealistic scenario but I
> needed  some throughput measures for such a situation.
>
> Having said that I then went for the option of modifying the source code to
> simulate this situation thus removing any need for special tweaking of the
> JMeter test.
>
> Thanks anyway for the help.
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Deepak Shetty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'd probably take a look at what you are trying to do - 30 "real" users
> > wouldnt synchronize access -
> > and if you expect your app to do the synchronizing then no further action
> > should be needed from Jmeter.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:51 AM, ruthm <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to set up the following scenario using JMeter?
> > >
> > > I have 30 users browsing through a site at the same time - I use a
> > > threadgroup with 30 threads to do that.
> > >
> > > There is then one particular http request which i want to synchronize
> > such
> > > that only one user can carry out that request at a time. Is there any
> > > controller that allows me to do this?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Ruth
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Allowing-only-one-thread-to-make-a-request-at-a-time-tp5537163p5537163.html
> > > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to