On 27 September 2013 07:27, Sebastiano Spicuglia
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for the reply.

What is the JMeter version?

Are you running the test in stand-alone or client-server mode?

> Sorry I'm quite new with JMeter, where could I find the
> timestamp of the readings?

In the jmeter.log file

> Btw: I checked what is the maximum throughput of that server
> (the same info I was trying to collect with JMeter) with another load
> generator (httperf). It is around 20req/s.
> Therefore the last line of Jmeter's log seems to report a reasonable
> number.
>
> Is it possible that the cumulative and the delta are computed
> totally independently?

No, the same data is used.

>
> - Sebastiano
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:52 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 26 September 2013 14:24, Sebastiano Spicuglia
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I have a question about the throughput calculation in Jmeter.
>>
>> Which version of JMeter?
>>
>>> I set up a simple test plan and I configured jmeter to print information
>>> about the throughput using the information found in:
>>>
>>> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results
>>>
>>> The results I got are the following:
>>>
>>> summary +      1 in   0.2s =    4.6/s Avg:   218 Min:   218 Max:   218
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0
>>> summary +     92 in   5.3s =   17.2/s Avg:   784 Min:   199 Max:  1409
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 34 Started: 34 Finished: 0
>>> summary =     93 in   5.3s =   17.4/s Avg:   778 Min:   199 Max:  1409
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%)
>>> summary +    113 in   7.3s =   15.4/s Avg:  2068 Min:  1413 Max:  2638
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0
>>> summary =    206 in  11.3s =   18.2/s Avg:  1485 Min:   199 Max:  2638
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%)
>>> summary +    130 in     9s =   14.7/s Avg:  2829 Min:  2461 Max:  3128
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0
>>> summary =    336 in  17.4s =   19.3/s Avg:  2005 Min:   199 Max:  3128
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%)
>>> summary +    123 in     9s =   13.8/s Avg:  2878 Min:  2574 Max:  3082
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0
>>> summary =    459 in  23.3s =   19.7/s Avg:  2239 Min:   199 Max:  3128
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%)
>>> summary +    127 in     9s =   14.3/s Avg:  2873 Min:  2554 Max:  3200
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0
>>> summary =    586 in  29.3s =   20.0/s Avg:  2376 Min:   199 Max:  3200
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%)
>>> summary +    125 in     9s =   14.0/s Avg:  2876 Min:  2614 Max:  3090
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0
>>> summary =    711 in  35.3s =   20.1/s Avg:  2464 Min:   199 Max:  3200
>>> Err:     0 (0.00%)
>>>
>>> I am a little bit lost here.
>>>
>>> Why is the sum of all the intermediate intervals higher than final time?
>>
>> Rounding may account for some of the discrepancy, but it does seem odd
>> that the final few intermediates are 9s apart whereas the totals are
>> about 6s apart.
>>
>> Can you provide the timestamps for the readings?
>>
>>> If I did the math right the sum should be 48.8 while the final interval is 
>>> 35.3.
>>>
>>> Why is the final throughput (that should be the cumulative)  higher
>>> than all the intermediate?
>>
>> The throughput is samples/time so if the times are different the
>> throughput will also be different.
>>
>>> Could you please explain me how to read those results?
>>
>> The '+' lines are current interval only and the '=' are cumulative.
>>
>> The output is intended as a guide to how the test is progressing, not
>> for formal reporting.
>>
>>> Thank you very much for you support and congratulation for your job
>>> Best regards
>>> Sebastiano
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to