I'm curious, what can you use for formal reporting of JMeter run outputs? Many thanks, Jon.
On 27 September 2013 12:52, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 September 2013 07:27, Sebastiano Spicuglia > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > thank you for the reply. > > What is the JMeter version? > > Are you running the test in stand-alone or client-server mode? > > > Sorry I'm quite new with JMeter, where could I find the > > timestamp of the readings? > > In the jmeter.log file > > > Btw: I checked what is the maximum throughput of that server > > (the same info I was trying to collect with JMeter) with another load > > generator (httperf). It is around 20req/s. > > Therefore the last line of Jmeter's log seems to report a reasonable > > number. > > > > Is it possible that the cumulative and the delta are computed > > totally independently? > > No, the same data is used. > > > > > - Sebastiano > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:52 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26 September 2013 14:24, Sebastiano Spicuglia > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hello all, > >>> > >>> I have a question about the throughput calculation in Jmeter. > >> > >> Which version of JMeter? > >> > >>> I set up a simple test plan and I configured jmeter to print > information > >>> about the throughput using the information found in: > >>> > >>> > http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results > >>> > >>> The results I got are the following: > >>> > >>> summary + 1 in 0.2s = 4.6/s Avg: 218 Min: 218 Max: 218 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0 > >>> summary + 92 in 5.3s = 17.2/s Avg: 784 Min: 199 Max: 1409 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 34 Started: 34 Finished: 0 > >>> summary = 93 in 5.3s = 17.4/s Avg: 778 Min: 199 Max: 1409 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) > >>> summary + 113 in 7.3s = 15.4/s Avg: 2068 Min: 1413 Max: 2638 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0 > >>> summary = 206 in 11.3s = 18.2/s Avg: 1485 Min: 199 Max: 2638 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) > >>> summary + 130 in 9s = 14.7/s Avg: 2829 Min: 2461 Max: 3128 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0 > >>> summary = 336 in 17.4s = 19.3/s Avg: 2005 Min: 199 Max: 3128 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) > >>> summary + 123 in 9s = 13.8/s Avg: 2878 Min: 2574 Max: 3082 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0 > >>> summary = 459 in 23.3s = 19.7/s Avg: 2239 Min: 199 Max: 3128 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) > >>> summary + 127 in 9s = 14.3/s Avg: 2873 Min: 2554 Max: 3200 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0 > >>> summary = 586 in 29.3s = 20.0/s Avg: 2376 Min: 199 Max: 3200 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) > >>> summary + 125 in 9s = 14.0/s Avg: 2876 Min: 2614 Max: 3090 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 60 Started: 60 Finished: 0 > >>> summary = 711 in 35.3s = 20.1/s Avg: 2464 Min: 199 Max: 3200 > >>> Err: 0 (0.00%) > >>> > >>> I am a little bit lost here. > >>> > >>> Why is the sum of all the intermediate intervals higher than final > time? > >> > >> Rounding may account for some of the discrepancy, but it does seem odd > >> that the final few intermediates are 9s apart whereas the totals are > >> about 6s apart. > >> > >> Can you provide the timestamps for the readings? > >> > >>> If I did the math right the sum should be 48.8 while the final > interval is 35.3. > >>> > >>> Why is the final throughput (that should be the cumulative) higher > >>> than all the intermediate? > >> > >> The throughput is samples/time so if the times are different the > >> throughput will also be different. > >> > >>> Could you please explain me how to read those results? > >> > >> The '+' lines are current interval only and the '=' are cumulative. > >> > >> The output is intended as a guide to how the test is progressing, not > >> for formal reporting. > >> > >>> Thank you very much for you support and congratulation for your job > >>> Best regards > >>> Sebastiano > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
