Hello Felix, thanks for your answer. Unfortunately, I can't share the script because it contains private data like passwords and URLs.
My java version is 11.0.3 2019-04-16 LTS, the OS is Windows 10. I can share the jtl file with one iteration of the test. As you can see, the second transaction (2_MFP_Login) takes almost 8 seconds, while on the BSM it takes something like 3,5 seconds. As I said, if I increment the number of iterations, I get better times on the subsequent runs (6.5 seconds for that transaction), but still far from BSM. Thanks Il giorno mer 26 mag 2021 alle ore 21:10 Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> ha scritto: > > Am 26.05.21 um 21:00 schrieb Gabriele D'Antona: > > Hello, > > I'm a consultant working for a customer that wants to test JMeter as an > > alternative to HP BSM (now owned by Microfocus). > > > > I registered one navigation that is (or at least shoudl be) identical to > > the BSM one (same URLs, same methods, same parameters). When comparing > the > > results, even on single transactions, the times registered by JMeter are > 2x > > the BSM ones. I'm talking of simple HTTPs calls, nothing fancy. I'm also > > launching the jmx project from the command line (no GUI). > > > > I noticed that, if I run the jmx project with 3 or 4 iterations, the > first > > iteration is 2x longer than the BSM one, the subsequent iterations are > > faster, but still 1.5x if compared to BSM. > > > > I hope you can give me some suggestions on this problem. > > > > Also, is there a way to fill the resulting jtl file only with the last > > transaction? This would help having lower response times. > > You are quite vague on how you are setting up the plan and what versions > of Java, JMeter or OS you are using. > > Can you be more specific? Maybe give a real example? > > Felix > > > > > Many thanks. > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
