jb-3 wrote: > > Hi, > > it depends of your etc/jre.properties configuration. If > etc/jre.properties (for jre-1.6) contains javax.annotation, it means > that the javax.annotation is provided by the JDK. If it's commented (as > we have in ServiceMix), it means that javax.annotation is provided by an > "external" bundle, such as Geronimo specs. > > So do you use the JDK or the external bundle for javax.annotation ? > > Thanks > Regards > JB > > On 03/13/2011 01:18 AM, Dan Tran wrote: >> Hi I have a very simple spring power bundle which uses @PostContruct >> and @PreDestroy. The bundle is built with bundlor-maven-plugin. It >> works fine at initial try. >> >> Then, I add java.annotation's version to the manifest ( >> bundlor-maven-plugin complains about the mising version). Deploy again >> with geronimo-annotation's bundle. The PostContruct and PreDestroy >> stops working. >> >> Kara 2.2 does not complain about bundle, every thing looks good. >> >> Is there a workaround? This prevents me from deploying and use >> activemq client ( which also uses geronimo-annotation ) >> >> This sounds likes a very fundamental problem, but I am not able to >> find any existing similar issue yet >> >> Big thanks ahead. >> >> -Dan >
Another item to consider is the version number of the javax.annotations package you'd like to use. All packages in the jre.properties file are made available under version 0.0.0. If you are using an external javax.annotations package for your application, simply identifying the version number of the javax.annotations packages will tell karaf to NOT use the jre.properties defined javax.annotations package. For example, using the following will allow you to use the jsr250-api for annotation: javax.annotation jsr250-api 1.0 Then, in your maven-bundle-plugin you'd have the following in your section to use this version of javax.annotation: javax.annotation;version=1.0; Its been my experience that removing stuff from your jre.properties file can have unforeseen results, and unless you can't differentiate between packages using the version number, you really shouldn't remove packages from it. ----- Karafman Slayer of the JEE Pounder of the Perl Programmer -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/javax-annotation-weirdness-tp2671048p2676684.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
