Hi Dan, thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it. I opened a issue for this to keep track of it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010
Regards, Achim 2011/11/14 Dan Tran <[email protected]> > May be this can help > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html > > Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's distribution? > > -d > > > On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> > wrote: > > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which isn't > anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used. > > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm not > certain it is for windows. > > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult the > karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :) > > Regards, Achim > > > > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> > >> > >> Achim, > >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL > or not and the answer then is no. > >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions. > How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What > version is it? > >> /Bengt > >> > >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Hi Bengt, > >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is > available at a ASF friendly license. > >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not > Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used. > >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by > installing/upgrading it yourself :) > >>> Regards, Achim > >>> > >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java > (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a > serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit > Wrapper on 64 bit java. > >>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they > do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could > provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic > to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could > be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit > wrapper. > >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is > important. > >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki > wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with > Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper) > with our applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source > code? > >>>> /Benke > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> *Achim Nierbeck* > >>> > >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > *Achim Nierbeck* > > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer > & Project Lead > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > > -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
