Hi guys, I updated the wrapper in Karaf 2.2.4 to use 64 bits on Linux.
I'm gonna take a look on that one. Regards JB On 11/14/2011 04:27 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
Hi Dan, thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it. I opened a issue for this to keep track of it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010 Regards, Achim 2011/11/14 Dan Tran <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> May be this can help http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's distribution? -d On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which isn't anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used. > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm not certain it is for windows. > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult the karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :) > Regards, Achim > > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> Achim, >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL or not and the answer then is no. >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions. How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What version is it? >> /Bengt >> >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> >>> Hi Bengt, >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is available at a ASF friendly license. >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used. >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by installing/upgrading it yourself :) >>> Regards, Achim >>> >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit Wrapper on 64 bit java. >>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit wrapper. >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is important. >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source code? >>>> /Benke >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Achim Nierbeck* >>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> > > > > -- > *Achim Nierbeck* > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
