Got it, and it makes sense (I'm still jetlagged ;))

Regards
JB

On 08/08/2012 05:49 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
Hey JB,

OK; I think we've two different situations here

a) we need at least some background logs; e.g. if you register a
feature via the featureService directly or via the
etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg
b) in addition it would be nice to have a -v param for the command to
get some output during the installation directly on the console.
Independently that one is required to be implemented for every command
separately; therefore I'm not really sure if it would make sense to
add this into the core? In addition I'm not sure if the -v param is
(compared to the log) really required for each command. E.g. what
should -v output for log:tail?

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey Andreas,

I don't want to move anything in OsgiCommandSupport. If we consider that
"verbose" option should be present in most/all commands, we can add the
option directly into OsgiCommandSupport.

My 0.02$

Regards
JB


On 08/08/2012 04:55 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:

OK, sorry but I really don't get what you mean :-) Can you please
detail your idea a bit? What exactly do you want to move to the
OsgiCommandSupport?

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

It sounds good, in that case we can add this directly in
OsgiCommandSupport
as most of the commands (all ?) extends it.

Regards
JB


On 08/07/2012 05:41 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:


IMHO the verbose feature is interesting for everything on the
commandline; the log should always be written, at least at some
extend, independent from the -v param; shouldn't it?

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:


We already did this for the instance (add a verbose flag to write in
the
log
file), so it makes sense to do the same for features.

Regards
JB


On 08/07/2012 05:15 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:



but those are written to the console; maybe we should have some basic
log to the log during the process too in info mode?

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:



Hi guys,

FYI, in pure Karaf commands, we have the -v (verbose) option to see
where
we
are in the features installation process (to know which bundle is in
download, etc).

Regards
JB


On 08/07/2012 03:34 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:




Hey Martin,

Sounds like a great idea; can you create an jira for this that we
don't loose track of this improvement? (an attached patch is btw,
always welcomed too ;-))

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:30 PM, lichtin <[email protected]> wrote:




Hi
During testing with Pax-Exam, I noticed there's no (info) log
output
at
all
during a feature installation.
Installing some larger feature can take a long time and it would be
nice
to
see some progress.

My suggestion is to change the log level to INFO for the
"Installing
bundle"
lines:

2012-08-07 14:57:21,760 | DEBUG | Thread-7         |
FeaturesServiceImpl
| 39 - org.apache.karaf.features.core - 2.2.8 | Installing bundle
mvn:org.apache.cxf/cxf-rt-ws-addr/2.6.1
2012-08-07 14:57:21,846 | DEBUG | Thread-7         |
FeaturesServiceImpl
| 39 - org.apache.karaf.features.core - 2.2.8 | Installing bundle




mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.ehcache/2.5.1_1

and perhaps also for the "Installing feature" lines:

2012-08-07 14:57:47,359 | DEBUG | Thread-7         |
FeaturesServiceImpl
| 39 - org.apache.karaf.features.core - 2.2.8 | Installing feature
camel-core 2.10.0
2012-08-07 14:57:47,359 | DEBUG | Thread-7         |
FeaturesServiceImpl
| 39 - org.apache.karaf.features.core - 2.2.8 | Installing feature
spring
3.0.7.RELEASE




--
View this message in context:



http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/No-info-log-output-when-installing-a-feature-tp4025433.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com




--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to