cool, I will try to build my own version of karaf 2.3.1 snapshot to aries 1.0.2
Thanks -Dan On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, I've raised and fixed > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1004 > Can you see if the latest snapshots works better for you ? > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I fix a bunch of problems with blueprint shutting down recently, so could >> you try with a recent blueprint snapshot and see if that helps ? >> For now, blueprint bundles are shut down roughly according to their start >> level. THere's something in blueprint which is supposed to better use the >> bundle service usage and shutdown bundles so that the problem you see would >> not happen, however, this only happen when the blueprint extender itself is >> stopped, which in fact, does not really help because the extender has a very >> low start level and is thus stopped very late in the process. >> Something that could be improved in blueprint is reacting to the fact that >> a framework shutdown is initiated and do that orderly shutdown earlier in >> the process. >> In all cases, your bundles should be able to deal with cases where one >> dependency is missing and be able to shutdown cleanly anyway. >> So I would suggest you try with the latest blueprint snapshots and see if >> it helps. I can write a patch to see if the modification i suggested above >> would help (I think it should) if you want to give it a try. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi JB, >>> >>> I only try 2.3, my new work does not work with 2.2 >>> >>> what is osgi/karaf shutdown sequencing flow? like it would shutdown >>> all bundles with the same start- level in the order from high to low ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -D >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Dan, >>> > >>> > did you try both with Karaf 2.2.x and 2.3.x ? >>> > did you see differences in the behavior ? >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > JB >>> > >>> > >>> > On 01/16/2013 09:17 PM, Dan Tran wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi I have a service's PreDestroy method which requires a service from >>> >> other bundle during shutdown. However at shutdown time, blueprint make >>> >> the required service 'unavailable'. Using start level ordering does >>> >> not seem to help. >>> >> >>> >> What are your experiences dealing with this issue? >>> >> >>> >> Big thanks ahead. >>> >> >>> >> -Dan >>> >> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> > jbono...@apache.org >>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------ >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> FuseSource, Integration everywhere >> http://fusesource.com > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com
