I suppose people find the enhanced log4j version sufficient. A bunch of sutff has been added to the basic log4j embedded in paxlogging, such as MDCSiftingAPpender, ZipROllingFileAppender, MDCMatchFilter and missing property based configuration for hierachical bits.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Gareth <gareth.o.coll...@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't it though a separate bundle (pax-logging-service vs. > pax-logging-logback)? From looking at the code it looks like whilst it uses > the same pid as the pax-logging-service, pax-logging-logback works a little > differently (the org.ops4j.pax.logging configuration contains a pointer to > the real logback configuration). > > I can do all this myself (download pax-logging-logback to the embedded > repository, change startup properties to use pax-logging-logback instead of > pax-logging-service, change the default org.ops4j.pax.logging.properties > file and add a logback.xml). It would be nice though if karaf could make it > easier (like it does with the equinox/felix switch). > > I am actually surprised that no-one else asked for this. Is logback not > used > much? > > thanks, > Gareth > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Logback-and-Apache-Karaf-tp4028183p4028195.html > Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
