Hi,

I remember that some old jetty version have bugs can cause 100% CPU usage when 
use SSL, are you use jetty with SSL(through Camel/CXF/Pax-WEB,whatnot)?

What's the jetty version in your container?
-------------
Freeman(Yue) Fang

Red Hat, Inc. 
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat



On 2014-5-7, at 上午2:06, Laci Gaspar wrote:

> I'm off work now so I can tell you tomorrow if I have several objects per 
> queue name. 
> But yes, AMQ is installed in karaf, because in the beginning we used a broker 
> inside karaf. We don't do that anymore, but AMQ is still installed in karaf. 
> Regards, 
> Laci
> 
> Am 06.05.2014 19:58 schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]>:
> OK ;)
> 
> I'm surprised that you have a lot of Object for queues. Especially do you 
> have a bunch of objects for the same queue name ?
> 
> Do you install ActiveMQ in Karaf (using the ActiveMQ features) ?
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 05/06/2014 06:09 PM, Laci Gaspar wrote:
> Hi JB
> We're using AMQ 5.9
> 
> Am 06.05.2014 18:02 schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> 
>     Hi Laci,
> 
>     What's the version of ActiveMQ that you use ? If you use ActiveMQ
>     5.7, there's a bug in the ConnectionFactory (it doesn't release
>     correctly the session). Maybe it's your issue (but not fully sure).
> 
>     Regards
>     JB
> 
>     On 05/06/2014 04:37 PM, Laci Gaspar wrote:
> 
>         Ok, after a little struggle, I installed jmxterm because I have
>         only a
>         terminal access to the host.
>         Unfortunately I have no idea what to do now... no jmx experience.
>         When I list the mbeans, I get TONS of entries representing my
>         ActiveMQ
>         queues.  Is that correct?
> 
>         Then, how can I find out which process uses most cpu?
> 
>         Thanks for your help.
>         Laci
> 
> 
>         On 06.05.2014 14:44, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> 
>             Also, do you have some trace levels activated with your
>             camel routes?
>             This might also produce a high load :)
>             But as Jamie already said, it's good to enable JMX
>             Monitoring ... this
>             way you also find out about the camel routes ;)
> 
>             regards, Achim
> 
> 
>             2014-05-06 14:07 GMT+02:00 Jamie G.
>             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>             <mailto:jamie.goodyear@gmail.__com
>             <mailto:[email protected]>>>:
> 
>                  Connect to the JMX management console and see what's
>             running up
>                  the CPU.
> 
>                  --Jamie
> 
>                  On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Laci Gaspar
>             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>                  <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>             wrote:
>                  > Hi
>                  > I noticed that our karaf runtime is using 100% CPU.
>                  > We are running karaf version 2.2.6 with some camel
>             routes. There
>                  is hardly
>                  > any load.
>                  >
>                  > Looking at the log file with level DEBUG didn't
>             reveal anything.
>                  >
>                  >
>                  > What can I do to find out what's causing the high cpu
>             load?
>                  >
>                  > Regards
>                  > Laci
> 
> 
> 
> 
>             --
> 
>             Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>             OPS4J Pax Web
>             <http://wiki.ops4j.org/__display/paxweb/Pax+Web/
>             <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>>
>             Committer & Project Lead
>             blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/__>
> 
>             Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> 
> 
> 
>     --
>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>     Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to