Hi JB,

If you don’t mind, I will send directly to you, instead of sharing on the list. 
:-)

Cheers,
=David



> On Nov 19, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> can you share what you set in resourceRepositories ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 11/19/2015 10:15 AM, David Leangen wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks, Guillaume!
>> 
>> I updated the config as you suggested:
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Pid:            org.apache.karaf.features
>> BundleLocation: null
>> Properties:
>>    featuresBoot = aries-blueprint, bundle, config, deployer,
>> diagnostic, feature, instance, jaas, kar, log, management, package,
>> service, shell, shell-compat, ssh, system, wrap
>>    featuresBootAsynchronous = false
>>    featuresRepositories =
>> mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/enterprise/4.0.3/xml/features,
>> mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/framework/4.0.3/xml/features,
>> mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/spring/4.0.3/xml/features,
>> mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/standard/4.0.3/xml/features
>>    felix.fileinstall.filename =
>> file:/usr/share/apache-karaf-4.0.3/etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg
>>    resourceRepositories = xml:http://my.reop.com/path/to/repo/index.xml
>> <http://my.reop.com/path/to/repo/index.xml>
>>    service.pid = org.apache.karaf.features
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Unfortunately, Karaf still does not “see” the provided bundles that
>> resolve the requirements. (I also tried with resourcesRepositores, i.e.
>> with the “s”.)
>> 
>> I suppose I’ll have to look into trying it programmatically as you suggest.
>> 
>> BTW, if I add a repo to my config this way, should it show up here?
>> 
>> karaf@root()> repositories
>> Name | Location
>> ---------------
>> 
>> Or is the Cave OBR somehow disconnected? The above returns empty. Would
>> be nice to see what is in the cache. When I (re)install my feature, the
>> old bundle keeps showing up (I suppose because it is resolvable).
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> =David
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You should investigate using the FeaturesService programmatically if
>>> you need.
>>> You can ask the resolver to add requirements using
>>>   featuresService.addRequirements(...)
>>> You should be able to configure to point to xml repositories.
>>> The syntax is:
>>> *resourceRepositories= [xml:url | json:url]...*
>>> So in your example, try with:
>>> resourceRepositories=xml:http://my.repo.com/path/to/repo/index.xml
>>> 
>>> Guillaume
>>> 
>>> 2015-11-19 9:41 GMT+01:00 David Leangen <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    Hi JB,
>>> 
>>>    Thanks again for your help. My bundle requirements are still not
>>>    getting resolved, though. :-(
>>> 
>>>    I added this to my etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg file:
>>> 
>>>    resourcesRepositories = \
>>>    http://my.repo.com/path/to/repo/index.xml
>>> 
>>>    But unfortunately, Karaf still does not “see” anything provided by
>>>    this repo.
>>> 
>>>    In OBR, I can only add a single jar at a time, not an entire repo
>>>    index. Even in the code, I noticed that cave only accepts files of
>>>    type:
>>> 
>>>    application/java-archive
>>>    application/octet-stream
>>>    application/vnd.osgi.bundle
>>> 
>>>    Anything other than those files types gets ignored.
>>> 
>>>    As a side note: to make my bundles work, I needed to add to the
>>>    code this mime type:
>>>    application/x-java-archive
>>> 
>>>    I could find out that is a registered mime type, though I do not
>>>    know the history as to where there is both
>>>    application/java-archive and application/x-java-archive.
>>> 
>>>    Cheers,
>>>    =David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>    On Nov 19, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>    Hi David,
>>>> 
>>>>    Karaf FeatureService uses capabilities/requirements provided by
>>>>    the registered features and bundles.
>>>>    You can also plug a OBR repository (directly the repository.xml
>>>>    or via Cave) using resourcesRepositories in
>>>>    etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg.
>>>> 
>>>>    In that case, the FeatureService will use the
>>>>    capabilities/requirements from the repositories.
>>>> 
>>>>    We discussed with Christian to improve the repository/resources
>>>>    by implicitly loading repository.xml per artifacts (instead of a
>>>>    "global/big" repository.xml).
>>>> 
>>>>    Regards
>>>>    JB
>>>> 
>>>>    On 11/18/2015 11:59 PM, David Leangen wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Or another, maybe better way, is to figure out how to create a
>>>>>    feature
>>>>>    by designating the “application bundle”, and letting the
>>>>>    requirements/capabilities pull in everything else.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    enRoute very nicely allows me to create indexed OBR
>>>>>    repositories. The
>>>>>    “application bundle” provides the ability, based on the declared
>>>>>    requirements, to pull in everything needed from the indexed
>>>>>    repositories.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Everything is there, it’s just creating the features.xml file
>>>>>    that is my
>>>>>    problem. :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Cheers,
>>>>>    =David
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>    On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:27 AM, David Leangen <[email protected]
>>>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Thanks for the tip. Somehow I always overlook the Enterprise specs…
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    I think you are right, Karaf Features are more what I want. My only
>>>>>>    problem is that I am using enRoute (and therefore gradle), and
>>>>>>    there
>>>>>>    does not seem to be any plug-in to create a Karaf Feature. To
>>>>>>    create
>>>>>>    one myself, I am discovering, will require me to really get
>>>>>>    into the
>>>>>>    details. My problem is time; if I had more time, I would be
>>>>>>    happy to
>>>>>>    do this. Since I don’t, I am looking for something “easy”.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Can you suggest a way (other than the maven plugin) that I can
>>>>>>    (non-manually) create a features file from enRoute / gradle?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Cheers,
>>>>>>    =David
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:51 AM, Achim Nierbeck
>>>>>>    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    if you are looking for a "standard" approach might want to
>>>>>>>    look in to
>>>>>>>    the ESA and Subsystem specs.
>>>>>>>    Subsystems is the "standardized" way of deploying applications,
>>>>>>>    though we worked on features quite long
>>>>>>>    and regard it to be superior, because simplere though more
>>>>>>>    effective.
>>>>>>>    ESA reminds me to much of an EAR like packaging,
>>>>>>>    but that's my 2 cents.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    regards, Achim
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    2015-11-18 19:28 GMT+01:00 David Leangen <[email protected]
>>>>>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Hmmm, I probably should have read further than the
>>>>>>>    introduction. :-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Seems that the “no-sharing” principle in this spec is very
>>>>>>>       strict. I can see the advantage of features, assuming that
>>>>>>>       features does not follow this “no-sharing” approach.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Guess I’ll have to continue my quest.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Cheers,
>>>>>>>       =David
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       > On Nov 19, 2015, at 2:58 AM, David Leangen
>>>>>>>    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>       <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > Hi!
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > Still on my quest to figure out how to deploy my apps on
>>>>>>>    Karaf
>>>>>>>       (without having to write features.xml files manually). I have
>>>>>>>       been looking at the Resolver Spec, but that seems to be more
>>>>>>>       low-level than I’d like. Looks like it is intended more for
>>>>>>>    tool
>>>>>>>       and framework developers.
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > I did come across Deployment Admin, which seems more
>>>>>>>    promising.
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > One question: It seems that Deployment Admin is not available
>>>>>>>       by default on Karaf. What is the reason to favour the
>>>>>>>       non-standard feature approach over Deployment Admin?
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > Cheers,
>>>>>>>       > =David
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    Apache Member
>>>>>>>    Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>>>    OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>>>    Committer & Project Lead
>>>>>>>    blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>>>    Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    --
>>>>    Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>    http://blog.nanthrax.net <http://blog.nanthrax.net/>
>>>>    Talend -http://www.talend.com <http://www.talend.com/>
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to