Wonderful. Something needs to be done about that, then.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:55 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:

> No, that's true for 2.x and 3.x.
> 4.x converts the feature list to a list of requirements, builds resources,
> launch the OSGi resolver, check the current state and apply the difference.
>
>
> 2016-08-26 13:52 GMT+02:00 James Carman <[email protected]>:
>
>> It iterates through what you hand it, doesn't it?
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, BootFeaturesInstaller keeps the order and pass a LinkedHashSet to
>>> the FeaturesServiceImpl, but that one does not care about the order by
>>> design.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-08-26 13:46 GMT+02:00 James Carman <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> We change the code to use a list ordered set, so the order is
>>>> preserved. It has been applied to all branches
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:45 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Afaik karaf-4642 only really applies to 3.x unless you use stages with
>>>>> one feature per stage.
>>>>> Features in a single stage are installed all at once, so the order is
>>>>> lost.
>>>>> A simple proof is to look at the list of bundles installed with a bare
>>>>> karaf 4.x install : the order of the installed bundles is unrelated to the
>>>>> order of the features listed in the configuration, that's because a single
>>>>> stage is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-08-26 13:14 GMT+02:00 James Carman <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not entirely true. The featuresBoot ordering has been fixed by
>>>>>> karaf-4642.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:42 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only way to influence the start order of bundles is to specify
>>>>>>> the start level on the feature or on the feature's bundles using the
>>>>>>> start-level attribute (see
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/karaf-4.0.x/assemblies/features/standard/src/main/feature/feature.xml
>>>>>>> for some examples).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In Karaf 4.x, the features are resolved and installed in a single
>>>>>>> pass, so the order is lost.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-08-26 4:58 GMT+02:00 oski_bear <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello, I'm a long-time user of Karaf 2.4.0 trying to migrate my
>>>>>>>> application
>>>>>>>> to Karaf 4.0.5. One thing I've noticed is that in this new version
>>>>>>>> of Karaf
>>>>>>>> there doesn't seem to be any way to specify the order in which
>>>>>>>> bundles are
>>>>>>>> ordered.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example, if I specify "bootFeatures" in the karaf-maven-plugin
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> don't start in the order that I list them. Additionally, when I
>>>>>>>> create my
>>>>>>>> own features they don't load in the order they are written and the
>>>>>>>> container
>>>>>>>> does not seem to respect the start levels.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am I missing something here? Is there a way to enforce a certain
>>>>>>>> order in
>>>>>>>> the boot features with the karaf-maven-plugin? Is there a way to
>>>>>>>> force an
>>>>>>>> order when defining a feature?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please help me understand.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-4-0-5-bundle-startup-order-tp4047689.html
>>>>>>>> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Red Hat, Open Source Integration
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Red Hat, Open Source Integration
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Red Hat, Open Source Integration
>>>
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Red Hat, Open Source Integration
>
> Email: [email protected]
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>

Reply via email to