It does not ignore the start levels. If you run "bundle:list -t 0", you'll see a bunch of bundles with various start levels. Those are not set in a random fashion ;-) So the bundle start levels are at least set correctly. And when I look at the debug log of the FeaturesServiceImpl, I can see the bundles are started according to their start level during the first boot (I've just tested both with a bare 4.0.5 install).
So I'm not sure what you've seen which wasn't working, but if you can replicate a behavior which does not seem to respect the start level, please raise a JIRA with a reproducible example. 2016-08-26 22:28 GMT+02:00 oski_bear <[email protected]>: > Hi Guillaume, using the start-level, as you suggested, is one of the first > things I tried and I was surprised that it did not have the expected > effect. > My determination is that Karaf 4.0.5 completely ignores the start-level. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble. > com/Karaf-4-0-5-bundle-startup-order-tp4047689p4047718.html > Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
