No, they are referenced in the feature as dependencies, I thought it would get installed.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019, 12:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi, > > do you have transaction & transaction-api features installed ? > > Regards > JB > > On 30/08/2019 18:06, Ryan Moquin wrote: > > > > when I try to install it, it fails with a missing dependency for some > > reason: > > > > org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException: Unable to resolve > > root: missing requirement [root] osgi.identity; > > osgi.identity=ecf-rs-distribution-hazelcast; type=karaf.feature; > > version="[1.4.0,1.4.0]"; > > > filter:="(&(osgi.identity=ecf-rs-distribution-hazelcast)(type=karaf.feature)(version>=1.4.0)(version<=1.4.0))" > > [caused by: Unable to resolve ecf-rs-distribution-hazelcast/1.4.0: > > missing requirement [ecf-rs-distribution-hazelcast/1.4.0] osgi.identity; > > osgi.identity=transaction-api; type=karaf.feature] > > > > So that's a bummer. > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:41 PM Scott Lewis <sle...@composent.com > > <mailto:sle...@composent.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi Ryan, > > > > On 8/29/2019 7:17 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: > >> It doesn't look like that hazelcast provider is part of the main > >> ecf feature repo for karaf? > > > > Not yet. I will look to add it soon, however. FWIW, it is part of > > the ECF bndtools workspace [1]. > > > >> Do we need to manually deploy the feature xml for the hazelcast > >> provider to our local maven repo to install it or is it available > >> in a maven repository somewhere? > > > > It is available as a karaf-feature (http jar access) here [2]. > > Feel free to put into local maven repo if you prefer. I am going > > to try to deploy this and some of the other distribution providers > > to maven central as well. > > > > Scott > > > > [1] https://github.com/ECF/bndtools.workspace > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/ECF/HazelcastProvider/blob/master/build/karaf-features.xml > > > > > >> > >> Ryan > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 6:17 PM Scott Lewis <sle...@composent.com > >> <mailto:sle...@composent.com>> wrote: > >> > >> <stuff deleted> > >> > One current shortcoming is that the Hazelcast provider does > >> not yet > >> > have a set of Karaf features for it (like most other ECF RS > >> > providers), but that would be easy for us to create/produce > >> if requested. > >> > >> A karaf feature was added [1] for version 1.4.0 of the Hazelcast > >> distribution provider [2]. > >> > >> Scott > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://github.com/ECF/HazelcastProvider/blob/master/build/karaf-features.xml > >> > >> [2] https://github.com/ECF/HazelcastProvider > >> > >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
