Tried your advise and it worked perfectly - thanks!

/Bengt

Den tors 10 mars 2022 kl 09:16 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>:

> Sorry, just saw that you answered how to provide capability via the
> feature - will try that.
>
> /Bengt
>
> Den tors 10 mars 2022 kl 09:06 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>:
>
>> Thanks a lot JB - this really helps!
>>
>> Do you also know if it is possible to make pax-jdbc generate the
>> corresponding "provides"? Otherwise I might do as you suggest and disable
>> the capabilities.
>>
>> /Bengt
>>
>> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 21:02 skrev Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>> >:
>>
>>> Exactly: maven-bundle-plugin 2.3.7 doesn't generate the
>>> Requirement/Capability headers. That's why it works. If you deploy your
>>> bundles built with this version, you won't have the problem.
>>>
>>> maven-bundle-plugin 5.1.4 generates the req/cap headers, used by the
>>> features service. If you want, you can disable req/cap headers generation.
>>> Just pass the following instructions to maven-bundle-plugin:
>>>
>>> <_norequirements>true</_norequirements>
>>> <_nocapabilities>true</_nocapabilities>
>>>
>>> So, it's what I said in my previous email: it's not related directly to
>>> Karaf (Karaf features resolver use req/cap since Karaf 4.2.x), it's because
>>> your bundles MANIFEST have changed (when you upgraded the
>>> maven-bundle-plugin version).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:37 PM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aha - thanks a lot. I thought I was goin crazy. I use pax-jdbc for the
>>>> data source. I'll need to check if it can provide the capability. Or, maybe
>>>> the problem is in the other end. I updated to a newer version of maven
>>>> bundle plugin (from 2.3.7 to 5.1.4) - maybe the old one didn't require the
>>>> capability.
>>>>
>>>> /Bengt
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, 18:27 Jean-Baptiste Onofré, <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, you didn't get my point.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact the datasource is there or not doesn't matter at runtime if
>>>>> it doesn't provide the capability.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me explain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your bundles history-stuff contains in META-INF/MANIFEST:
>>>>>
>>>>> Require-Capability:
>>>>> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass="javax.sql.DataSource";filter=....
>>>>>
>>>>> When you install with bundle:install, this header is simply ignored.
>>>>>
>>>>> BUT, when you install using features service, the feature resolver
>>>>> check all bundles requirements/capabilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, the feature resolver is looking for:
>>>>> - a bundle containing Provide-Capability header in MANIFEST
>>>>> matching the requirement
>>>>> - a feature containing <capability/> matching the requirement
>>>>>
>>>>> It's nothing related to runtime (the actual bundle installed and
>>>>> running), only the MANIFEST cap/req matter;
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in your case, you can just provide the capability in the feature
>>>>> providing the datasource. It's exactly what you can see in the
>>>>> karaf-jpa-example:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/main/examples/karaf-jpa-example/karaf-jpa-example-features/src/main/feature/feature.xml#L28
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:30 PM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> But the  filetransfoerhistoryjta datasource is there. I've verified
>>>>>> that. And if I install the bundle directly instead of going through the
>>>>>> feature it works fine and connects to the datasource. Why can it not be
>>>>>> found when I go through the feature but when I install the bundle 
>>>>>> directly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Bengt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 17:10 skrev Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't think anything changed on the resolver, maybe you updated
>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin or bnd to create your bundle, and now it includes 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> requirement (whereas your bundles didn't contain requirement in MANIFEST
>>>>>>> before).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:59 PM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I didn't have any problems with this using Karaf 4.3.3. Do you know
>>>>>>>> if something has changed? I'm using Karaf 4.3.6 now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /Bengt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 16:46 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com
>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to stop the feature installer from using the
>>>>>>>>> resolver?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /Bengt
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 16:37 skrev Bengt Rodehav <
>>>>>>>>> be...@rodehav.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I didn't get any extra information. I got the same
>>>>>>>>>> as before which is:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2022-03-09T16:26:02,494 | INFO  | pipe-feature:install -v
>>>>>>>>>> connect-filetransfer-history-db | FeaturesServiceImpl              | 
>>>>>>>>>> 18 -
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.karaf.features.core - 4.3.6 | Adding features:
>>>>>>>>>> connect-filetransfer-history-db/[3.1.0.SNAPSHOT,3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]
>>>>>>>>>> 2022-03-09T16:26:02,901 | ERROR | Karaf local console user karaf
>>>>>>>>>> | ShellUtil                        | 70 - 
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.karaf.shell.core -
>>>>>>>>>> 4.3.6 | Exception caught while executing command
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException: Unable to
>>>>>>>>>> resolve root: missing requirement [root] osgi.identity;
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.identity=connect-filetransfer-history-db; type=karaf.feature;
>>>>>>>>>> version="[3.1.0.SNAPSHOT,3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]";
>>>>>>>>>> filter:="(&(osgi.identity=connect-filetransfer-history-db)(type=karaf.feature)(version>=3.1.0.SNAPSHOT)(version<=3.1.0.SNAPSHOT))"
>>>>>>>>>> [caused by: Unable to resolve
>>>>>>>>>> connect-filetransfer-history-db/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT: missing requirement
>>>>>>>>>> [connect-filetransfer-history-db/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT] osgi.identity;
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.identity=se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain;
>>>>>>>>>> type=osgi.bundle; version="[3.1.0.SNAPSHOT,3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]";
>>>>>>>>>> resolution:=mandatory [caused by: Unable to resolve
>>>>>>>>>> se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT:
>>>>>>>>>> missing requirement
>>>>>>>>>> [se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.service; objectClass=javax.sql.DataSource; effective:=active;
>>>>>>>>>> filter:="(osgi.jndi.service.name=jdbc/filetransferhistoryjta)"]]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1341)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.doResolve(ResolverImpl.java:433)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.resolve(ResolverImpl.java:420)
>>>>>>>>>>  ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.resolve(ResolverImpl.java:374)
>>>>>>>>>>  ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.region.SubsystemResolver.resolve(SubsystemResolver.java:257)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:399)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.FeaturesServiceImpl.doProvision(FeaturesServiceImpl.java:1069)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.FeaturesServiceImpl.lambda$doProvisionInThread$13(FeaturesServiceImpl.java:1004)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833) [?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException:
>>>>>>>>>> Unable to resolve connect-filetransfer-history-db/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT: 
>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>> requirement [connect-filetransfer-history-db/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT] 
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.identity;
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.identity=se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain;
>>>>>>>>>> type=osgi.bundle; version="[3.1.0.SNAPSHOT,3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]";
>>>>>>>>>> resolution:=mandatory [caused by: Unable to resolve
>>>>>>>>>> se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT:
>>>>>>>>>> missing requirement
>>>>>>>>>> [se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.service; objectClass=javax.sql.DataSource; effective:=active;
>>>>>>>>>> filter:="(osgi.jndi.service.name=jdbc/filetransferhistoryjta)"]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1341)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> ... 12 more
>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException:
>>>>>>>>>> Unable to resolve
>>>>>>>>>> se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT:
>>>>>>>>>> missing requirement
>>>>>>>>>> [se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer.history-domain/3.1.0.SNAPSHOT]
>>>>>>>>>> osgi.service; objectClass=javax.sql.DataSource; effective:=active;
>>>>>>>>>> filter:="(osgi.jndi.service.name=jdbc/filetransferhistoryjta)"
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1341)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1341)
>>>>>>>>>> ~[?:?]
>>>>>>>>>> ... 12 more
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I tried the "--store" option which gave me a quite large file
>>>>>>>>>> that I unfortunately did not understand fully. Not sure if it helps 
>>>>>>>>>> any.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /Bengt
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 16:22 skrev Bengt Rodehav <
>>>>>>>>>> be...@rodehav.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK - thanks. Will try that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /Bengt
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 16:16 skrev Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The main difference is that feature used the resolver to
>>>>>>>>>>>> optimize the installation. Bundle installation doesn’t use the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> feature
>>>>>>>>>>>> resolver.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You can use feature:install -v to get resolver output and you
>>>>>>>>>>>> will probably see the chain found by the resolver.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:22, Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a very strange problem (in Karaf 4.3.6). I use JPA and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a bundle containing a persistence.xml in which a datasource 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> referenced:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   <jta-data-source>osgi:service/javax.sql.DataSource/(
>>>>>>>>>>>>> osgi.jndi.service.name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> =jdbc/filetransferhistoryjta)</jta-data-source>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the datasource is not available when I install this bundle
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I will get an error complaining that the datasource is not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> present.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The strange thing is that it seems to be dependent on how I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> install this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle - directly installing the bundle or doing it via a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. In the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first case it works but in the latter it doesn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I first install all the prerequisites I need and then issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following command in the Karaf shell:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   bundle:install -s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn:se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer/history-domain/3.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then it works fine. It even works if I remove the "-s" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the bundle afterwards instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, if I use the following feature:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   <feature name="connect-filetransfer-history-db"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="3.1-SNAPSHOT">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bundle>mvn:se.digia.connect.services.filetransfer/history-domain/3.1-SNAPSHOT</bundle>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   </feature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then issue the following command:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   feature:install connect-filetransfer-history-db
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the datasource cannot be found and the install fails.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This happens consistently. I am using Pax-Jdbc for exposing the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> datasource
>>>>>>>>>>>>> via JNDI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> First I thought that there might be a timing problem and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have to wait a while to get the datasource published but it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem to have anything to do with that at all. I can wait 5 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes after
>>>>>>>>>>>>> installing the datasource. I also check with the command 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "jndi:names" that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is published. But it still doesn't work using a feature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me what is being done differently when I use a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature compared to when I just install the bundle directly? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apparently some kind of difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Bengt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to