+1 I don't know of anybody using Picketlink. I think that uses wanting SSO support would use our SSO framework.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Sandeep More <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > On my side, I have not come across PicketLink usage. > > Best, > Sandeep > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:30 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All - >> >> It has come to my attention that the PicketLink Provider is pulling in >> some >> dependencies that seem to actually be LGPL licensed rather that ASL v2 as >> is claimed by picketlink itself. >> >> Since the picketlink provider has been functionally replaced by the pac4j >> provider, I propose that we just remove it from Apache Knox. >> >> I don't know of anyone using it and it doesn't even seem to be documented >> but I wanted to just check with the everyone before I remove it. >> >> I will file a JIRA and likely remove it immediately. >> >> Please feel free to raise any concerns that you may have. >> >> thanks! >> >> --larry >> > >
