+1. Colm.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Jeffrey Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > I don't know of anybody using Picketlink. I think that uses wanting SSO > support would use our SSO framework. > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Sandeep More <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> On my side, I have not come across PicketLink usage. >> >> Best, >> Sandeep >> >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:30 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> All - >>> >>> It has come to my attention that the PicketLink Provider is pulling in >>> some >>> dependencies that seem to actually be LGPL licensed rather that ASL v2 as >>> is claimed by picketlink itself. >>> >>> Since the picketlink provider has been functionally replaced by the pac4j >>> provider, I propose that we just remove it from Apache Knox. >>> >>> I don't know of anyone using it and it doesn't even seem to be documented >>> but I wanted to just check with the everyone before I remove it. >>> >>> I will file a JIRA and likely remove it immediately. >>> >>> Please feel free to raise any concerns that you may have. >>> >>> thanks! >>> >>> --larry >>> >> >> > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
