Michael Wechner wrote:
Doug Chestnut wrote:

Yeah, I started with that approach, but ran into problems with things like the page-envelope and usecases not recognizing the path.



right, but why did you actually need the page-envelope resp what usecases?

Don't have time to look for examples now ;).
Using the same path made it allot easier to make the usecases as I didn't have to rewrite methods that expect the standard path format ( DocumentUsecase.getSourceDocument ). I was even able to simply use the existing delete usecase for the DELETE method.

How about the authorizer action?  Doesn't this expect the general path?

--Doug

Thanks

Michi



Haven't tried it, but it looks like zope uses another port for webDAV. Playing around yesterday, it was easy to add a jetty listener on another port. Changing a couple of sitemaps and I have a webDAV specific port. The webDAV clients that I have tested so far work, but OO seems to have problems. I will take a closer look today.

--Doug

Michael Wechner wrote:

Doug Chestnut wrote:


Yeah, I am not sure that I like the idea of running another instance of lenya just for webDAV, don't know if cocoon/jetty can run on multiple ports without starting up another jetty instance.





what about a reserved prefix, e.g.

http://foo.bar/lenya/MY-PUB/webdav/....


IIRC that's what I did with the blog publication ...

HTH

Michi



Thanks,

Manos

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to