Hi, While writing some unit tests, I realised that I was performing some read-only assertions without being in a transaction. Exploring the issue a little more, it seems that nodes accessed within a transaction can then be accessed from outside a transaction. Is this the case? Or is my design "leaking" something?
I've wrapped try/finally programmatic transaction management in an abstract class which is anonymously subclassed to perform Neo operations. My actual domain objects don't deal with transactions at all, but run in transactions started at the service/controller level. For example, I have reference -> Domains -> Domain -> Projects ->Project. If I access Project1 in a transaction, I can later access it without a transaction, but I can't access Project2. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if this behaviour is normal. (I hope my explanation is clear enough...) Mwanji _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
