Hi! Emil Eifrem: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:58, Anders Nawroth<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Don't know if graphdbs should be considered part of NOSQL, what do you >> think? >> > > Huh? Yes! >
Well, then the definition of NOSQL @ wikipedia has to be made wider. At the moment it only addresses solutions to the horizontal scalability problem, but there are more to NOSQL than just that. Handle semi-structured content, scale to complexity etc. > I still think this categorization (scroll down in mail) of "emerging > nosql" databases is the best out there: > > http://groups.google.com/group/nosql-discussion/msg/31f8f71a88142c68 > What about structuring the wikipedia araticle using that? Throwing all implementations of "NOSQL" in a single bag isn't really useful. Actually I think *diversity* is at the core of NOSQL :-) /anders -- Anders Nawroth [[email protected]] GTalk, Skype: anders.nawroth Phone: +46 737 894 163 http://twitter.com/nawroth http://blog.nawroth.com/ _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
