Thank you Johan, I saw the comment but trac did not allow me to write a comment (spam??)
The code was just an implementation of an experimental design and I have already workaround it. The problem was that what I thought were independent operations like: create 0->1 create 1->2 were not so. Wouldn't it be good to have this documented? (In the transactions wiki page?). Regards, -- Daniel El mié, 18-11-2009 a las 17:44 +0100, Johan Svensson escribió: > Hi, > > I added a comment on the ticket. The problem is (as pointed out in the > comment) the join performed from thread 1 (main) on thread 2. If that > is removed both transactions will complete (no deadlock). > > Regards, > -Johan > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Martínez > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, I created a ticket, with the file attached: > > > > https://trac.neo4j.org/ticket/209 > > > > -- > > Daniel > > > > El jue, 12-11-2009 a las 13:48 +0100, Johan Svensson escribió: > > > >> Great! I was just about to ask for some test code. You can either send > >> it directly to me or here to the list. Another option is to upload it > >> to http://trac.neo4j.org if you create a ticket for the problem. > >> > >> -Johan > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
