On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Martínez <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Johan, > > I saw the comment but trac did not allow me to write a comment (spam??) > > The code was just an implementation of an experimental design and I have > already workaround it. > > The problem was that what I thought were independent operations like: > > create 0->1 > create 1->2 > > were not so. > > Wouldn't it be good to have this documented? (In the transactions wiki > page?).
Yes it would, will do. It is however a bit hard to explain since this will only happens when the two relationships in question (between 0->1 and 1->2) are next to each other in the "dual interleaved double linked list" (as I call it). If for example you had some other relationships from node 0->(to other nodes) and the relationship 0->1 was not right next to the insert of 1->2 the code you wrote would not block when joining. Regards, -Johan _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
