Hi there, IMHO and editable Wiki (which is the case now if you register) and mailing list is great for preserving information.
For a new channel, the focus would be to bring an additional quality to the community. That would be a non-formal, fast channel open to everyone, basically instead of individual chats and mails between people in the community. In that respect, I think IRC with loggin might be the way to go for the time being, until we see good examples of Waves being managed. Tobias and me are hanging in #neo4j @ irc.freenode.net , feel free to join and test how this works out. Lorin, do you have any pointers on IRC-archiving possibilities that we could look at? Otherwise, Happy New Year everyone, take it easy with the fire crackers! /peter neubauer COO and Sales, Neo Technology GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Relationships count. http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com - PageRank in 2 lines of code. http://www.linkedprocess.org - Computing at LinkedData scale. On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Lorin Halpert <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO Wave pages get extremely messy, disorganized and laggy very quickly. > > +1 for IRC on Freenode, there are archival bots available if logging is > really necessary. Although a simple shortcut bot is usually all that is > needed to run a smooth channel (see #css, can ask Zof about suggestions > regarding bots) > +1 for Wave as long as it is split over multiple public pages with proper > moderation, otherwise it's a heap of pain. > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Rick Bullotta < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for Wave, mostly because the discussions are persistent and searchable. >> I was a Wave "alpha" user so I am less taken in by the hype of Wave as the >> "next big thing", but it definitely has a place for certain types of >> collaboration. You'll probably also want to set up a Neo Google group, or >> even switch to Google Groups/Wave as the primary communications medium. >> Wave robots could also be used to sync with the "old" list server if >> needed. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On >> Behalf Of Peter Neubauer >> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:37 AM >> To: Neo user discussions >> Subject: [Neo] Communication channel preferences? >> >> Hi Folks, >> just wanted to check with you all if there is interest in some >> additional forms of communication? What do you think of >> >> IRC - very informal and fast, but non-logged and people tend to be >> inactive with no indication? >> Jabber chat room - not mainstream, people need an extra account >> Google Wave - new, beta, but loggable, we have invites for interested >> people, rich communication >> >> others? What are your preferences? >> >> Cheers, >> >> /peter neubauer >> >> COO and Sales, Neo Technology >> >> GTalk: neubauer.peter >> Skype peter.neubauer >> Phone +46 704 106975 >> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer >> Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer >> >> http://www.neo4j.org - Relationships count. >> http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com - PageRank in 2 lines of code. >> http://www.linkedprocess.org - Computing at LinkedData scale. >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
