So when you say same_name_rel_unique_id do you mean using dynamictypes since you can't declare these same_name_rel_unique_id types ahead of time?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Tim Langley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Cary > > It's a little cheating > But in situtations like this we create TWO relationships to each node > > One > NodeA -> same_name_rel -> NodeB > > The other > NodeA -> same_name_rel_unique_id -> NodeB > > This allows easy traversal > > Does this make sense? > > T > > Sent from my iPhone so please excuse typos adn brevity > > Tim Langley > +44 7989 539363 > > On 17 Mar 2010, at 21:47, Cary Cherng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have a very long sequence of numbers. Each number is interpreted as >> edges. I need to traverse the path defined by these edges but each >> node has many edges. >> >> Suppose I have the sequence 94, 3, 6. The problem I am encountering is >> that each node has many many edges I need to look at. From the initial >> node to find the first node in the path I need to look at every edge >> and check if its property is 94. >> >> Is there a way to optimize this such as making the property number a >> dynamic type? >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
