Yes Sent from my iPhone so please excuse typos adn brevity
Tim Langley +44 7989 539363 On 17 Mar 2010, at 21:58, Cary Cherng <[email protected]> wrote: > So when you say same_name_rel_unique_id do you mean using dynamictypes > since you can't declare these same_name_rel_unique_id types ahead of > time? > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Tim Langley <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hey Cary >> >> It's a little cheating >> But in situtations like this we create TWO relationships to each node >> >> One >> NodeA -> same_name_rel -> NodeB >> >> The other >> NodeA -> same_name_rel_unique_id -> NodeB >> >> This allows easy traversal >> >> Does this make sense? >> >> T >> >> Sent from my iPhone so please excuse typos adn brevity >> >> Tim Langley >> +44 7989 539363 >> >> On 17 Mar 2010, at 21:47, Cary Cherng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have a very long sequence of numbers. Each number is interpreted >>> as >>> edges. I need to traverse the path defined by these edges but each >>> node has many edges. >>> >>> Suppose I have the sequence 94, 3, 6. The problem I am >>> encountering is >>> that each node has many many edges I need to look at. From the >>> initial >>> node to find the first node in the path I need to look at every edge >>> and check if its property is 94. >>> >>> Is there a way to optimize this such as making the property number a >>> dynamic type? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Neo mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
