I got cali's benchmark result. Well, sort of benchmarks: 
http://github.com/dmitriid/cali/wiki/Benchmarks-of-sorts There's neo4j, 
TinkerGraph and OrientDB

For some odd reason neo4j performs abysmally, though yesterday it was way, way 
better: http://twitter.com/dmitriid/status/23912123904

Will have to investigate further.


> Hey,
> 
>> Yeah, it'll be my next step, I guess :) Blueprints make this stuff 
>> super-easy :)
> 
> Yea---write to the Blueprints interfaces and then you can plug and play your 
> graph backends.
> 
>> I also see plain simple FS in there as well ;)
> 
> Ha. Yea---I started that, but never went far with it. In short, it makes your 
> file system look like a property graph (e.g. subdirectory, contains, etc.). 
> When Gremlin moves into more advanced I/O support, I think I'll revisit 
> FileGraph as that might be a good way for Gremlin to interface with the 
> operating system's file system.
> 
>> BTW, I've also noticed there's mongodb support for storage (?) How would you 
>> use that?
> 
> Yea. So, long long ago, Peter and I wanted to make a single interface for all 
> NoSQL systems. The JSON databases of CouchDB and MongoDB were the next up 
> after property graphs... Currently, in Blueprints, there is support for 
> MongoDB and TinkerDoc as JSON databases, but its not fully tested, not fully 
> thought out, etc. etc... Hopefully in the near future, we can get some steam 
> to flesh all that out better.
> 
> Good luck with Cali,
> Marko.
> 
> http://markorodriguez.com
> http://tinkerpop.com

_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to