Yeah, I guess that could be a problem (or the problem).

Hmmm... I'll try and run the "benchmark" on a less busier machine and see what 
happens then.

Thanks for the tip!

> FWIW, I've noticed that neo4j seems to be fairly sensitive to disk I/O
> performance.
> 
> I couldn't get it to work at all on an NFS mountpoint.
> 
> It works much better on a Solaris tmpfs partition instead.
> 
> 
> 
>> I got cali's benchmark result. Well, sort of benchmarks:
>> http://github.com/dmitriid/cali/wiki/Benchmarks-of-sorts There's neo4j,
>> TinkerGraph and OrientDB
>> 
>> For some odd reason neo4j performs abysmally, though yesterday it was way,
>> way better: http://twitter.com/dmitriid/status/23912123904
>> 
>> Will have to investigate further.
>> 
>> 
>>> Hey,
>>> 
>>>> Yeah, it'll be my next step, I guess :) Blueprints make this stuff
>>>> super-easy :)
>>> 
>>> Yea---write to the Blueprints interfaces and then you can plug and play
>>> your graph backends.
>>> 
>>>> I also see plain simple FS in there as well ;)
>>> 
>>> Ha. Yea---I started that, but never went far with it. In short, it makes
>>> your file system look like a property graph (e.g. subdirectory,
>>> contains, etc.). When Gremlin moves into more advanced I/O support, I
>>> think I'll revisit FileGraph as that might be a good way for Gremlin to
>>> interface with the operating system's file system.
>>> 
>>>> BTW, I've also noticed there's mongodb support for storage (?) How
>>>> would you use that?
>>> 
>>> Yea. So, long long ago, Peter and I wanted to make a single interface
>>> for all NoSQL systems. The JSON databases of CouchDB and MongoDB were
>>> the next up after property graphs... Currently, in Blueprints, there is
>>> support for MongoDB and TinkerDoc as JSON databases, but its not fully
>>> tested, not fully thought out, etc. etc... Hopefully in the near future,
>>> we can get some steam to flesh all that out better.
>>> 
>>> Good luck with Cali,
>>> Marko.
>>> 
>>> http://markorodriguez.com
>>> http://tinkerpop.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rick Otten
> [email protected]
> O=='=+
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to