One key point of Davids suggestion is that it takes into account that each action of the user could take place from a different IP. Massimo's original model implied that the user would always be at the same IP for all actions, or if he could change IP's you would not know which of them related to which action.
So even though Davids model is more complex, it seems more correct. Another solution is to create a uid-ip node, representing all cases where a particular user is at a particular IP. Then that would have direct relations to all domains (as massimo originally had), and it would have a single relationship to it's user and it's ip nodes. The graph looks similar to Davids, but we would have much fewer nodes (all actions from the same uid-ip are merged). On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Montag > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Massimo, > > If you'd like, I could skype with you later this afternoon (in 4-5 hours) > > and discuss it? > > David > > Wow that's would be cool... But hopefully I'm going to be sleeping, I > need it... Anyway I'll do my homework and come back to you! > > Thanks for the offer... really appreciated. > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
