On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Craig Taverner <[email protected]> wrote:
> One key point of Davids suggestion is that it takes into account that each > action of the user could take place from a different IP. Massimo's original > model implied that the user would always be at the same IP for all actions, > or if he could change IP's you would not know which of them related to which > action. > > So even though Davids model is more complex, it seems more correct. > > Another solution is to create a uid-ip node, representing all cases where a > particular user is at a particular IP. Then that would have direct relations > to all domains (as massimo originally had), and it would have a single > relationship to it's user and it's ip nodes. The graph looks similar to > Davids, but we would have much fewer nodes (all actions from the same uid-ip > are merged). > This is exactly what I meant. > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Montag >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Massimo, >> > If you'd like, I could skype with you later this afternoon (in 4-5 >> hours) >> > and discuss it? >> > David >> >> Wow that's would be cool... But hopefully I'm going to be sleeping, I >> need it... Anyway I'll do my homework and come back to you! >> >> Thanks for the offer... really appreciated. >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > > -- David Montag Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com Cell: 650.556.4411 [email protected] _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
