Niels, taht sounds like a great suggestion. I just talked to Johan about supporting in-graph indexing structures in the indexing framework. Also, the whole Neo4j-Spatial index is essentially an in-graph indexing structure.
So, I would suggest that we put a component with in-graph "simple" indexing structures into place (maybe just timeline for the time being) and take this as a strating point to make the index framework respect them. If you send in the CLA according to http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/About_Contributor_License_Agreement, I can create the component stub adn you can put it in there? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Niels Hoogeveen <[email protected]> wrote: > > As one of the legacy users of the in-graph Timeline index, I have concern > over the future of this "component". > Right now the in-graph Timeline index is part of the component neo4j-index, > which also contains the legacy Lucene index. > This component has a dependency on Lucene 3.0.1, while Neo4J 1.4 depends on > Lucene 3.10. > Of course it makes no sense to keep upgrading legacy code to newer versions > of Lucene. > As a result of that, applications depending on the in-graph Timeline are > stuck with Neo4J 1.3, without there actually being a good reason for that. > Last week I already wrote a message about this issue but did so over the > weekend, triggering little response. (see: > http://lists.neo4j.org/pipermail/user/2011-June/008935.html) > In a message early May, I suggested the creation of a component > Neo4J-collections, where all sorts of in-graph data structures can be grouped > together. (see: http://lists.neo4j.org/pipermail/user/2011-May/008461.html) > I hope my suggestion will somehow lead to a solution where the in-graph > Timeline index can become part of the standard Neo4J infrastructure. > Kind regards, > Niels Hoogeveen > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
