I like that!

Now some beer. Free. Friday.

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

GTalk:      neubauer.peter
Skype       peter.neubauer
Phone       +46 704 106975
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.


On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Rick Bullotta
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Let's hope that one day soon all of these issues will be "non-issues"!
>
> Having cool technology always "coming soon" reminds me of this sign:
> http://www.rareirishstuff.com/media/13/a20792b12af7736b49978d_m.JPG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Thomas Fritz
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 10:17 AM
> To: Neo4j user discussions
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Websocket Server instead of REST for Neo4J for access
> a DB
>
> Hi.
>
> Thanks for your fast reply.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2011/8/26 Rick Bullotta <[email protected]>:
> > A few potential challenges and reasons to wait on this:
> >
> > - the Websocket API is still in a state of change
> thats true. But i think, since the latest security issues are solved
> now with the latest protocol version, hopefully there are no breaking
> changes anymore
>
> > - the existing REST API is synchronous request/response, so there's not a
> lot of benefit to switching to websockets without a lot of rework
> I think thats a real challenge. Since locking and concurrent writes
> come into play - Except you would allow only one websocket connection
>
> > - The real benefit will be when you Javascript and other web clients can
> use a pure binary protocol (not possible today)
> I pretty sure it is in the latest protocol definition. But i think no
> Browser at this time of writing has implemented the binary parts.
>
> regards
>
> Tom
>
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Thomas Fritz
> > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 9:52 AM
> > To: Neo4j user discussions
> > Subject: [Neo4j] Websocket Server instead of REST for Neo4J for access a
> DB
> >
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Have anyone thought, or is it possible to implement a Websocket
> > Endpoint in Neo4J Server so one can use this instead of the RESTful
> > API. Which would be more performant and scalable than the RESTful HTTP
> > API. It is possible to use such a Websocket through Java, Node and any
> > other Server Side Language and even JavaScript on the client side.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Thomas FRITZ
> > web http://fritzthomas.com
> > twitter http://twitter.com/thomasf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to