community 1.4.1. embedded
Am 05.10.2011 15:54, schrieb Mattias Persson: > Hi, > > which version of neo4j were you running this with? > > 2011/10/5 st.pa<[email protected]> > >> >> Hi. >> >> I tried to delete several million relationships of certain types from the >> reference node of an embedded graphdb, where there were several other >> relationshiptypes that were not to be affected. The Javadoc of >> Node#getRelationships(**RelationshipType...) says that it returns all >> relationships of the given type(s), so I expected that after one call I'd >> really get all. That was not the case. In my test-production-db i needed >> about 8 iterations, haven't recreated that in the test yet. But the test >> shows that not returning all desired relationships doesn't seem to depend on >> the total number of relationships as i thought in the beginning, if one runs >> the test with different numbers for insertions. >> >> Here's the log: >> >> 05.10.2011 13:36:16 test01 - create graph >> 05.10.2011 13:36:16 try to delete c:/_src/neo4j-test-remove-** >> relationships >> 05.10.2011 13:36:16 done deleting >> 05.10.2011 13:36:16 create graph db at c:/_src/neo4j-test-remove-** >> relationships >> 05.10.2011 13:36:22 retrieve root node and add another node >> 05.10.2011 13:36:22 prepare to cycle through relTypes >> 05.10.2011 13:36:22 loop to insert relationships by cycling through >> relTypes >> 05.10.2011 13:36:22 0 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:26 131072 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:28 262144 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:33 393216 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:35 524288 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:40 655360 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:43 786432 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:48 917504 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:53 1048576 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:36:58 1179648 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:02 1310720 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:08 1441792 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:12 1572864 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:20 1703936 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:25 1835008 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:33 1966080 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:37 2097152 of 2097152 relationships inserted >> 05.10.2011 13:37:37 finished inserting 2097152 relationships >> 05.10.2011 13:37:37 second part of test: deleting relationships >> 05.10.2011 13:37:37 get all relationships of the given type >> 05.10.2011 13:37:37 delete them all >> 05.10.2011 13:38:21 131072 relationships deleted >> 05.10.2011 13:38:39 262144 relationships deleted >> 05.10.2011 13:38:41 262153 relationships deleted in iteration 1 >> 05.10.2011 13:38:41 get all relationships of the given type >> 05.10.2011 13:38:41 delete them all >> 05.10.2011 13:39:12 131072 relationships deleted >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 262135 relationships deleted in iteration 2 >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 get all relationships of the given type >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 delete them all >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 0 relationships deleted in iteration 3 >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 could expect that one iteration is sufficient >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 to get all relationships of the given types, >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 so that it finished after the second iterations when >> deletions == 0 >> 05.10.2011 13:39:22 if this line gets logged, then there were more than two >> iterations, which is bad >> >> >> And the testcase is attached as .java-file. Could please somebody take a >> look at it and the log and maybe find my mistake or confirm that this is >> strange behaviour. >> >> ciao, >> st.p. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
