Thanks again for the answer but my system is actually a benchmarking system! In other words I am trying to find out if there are performance difference between the 2 DBs not through an application.
On 10/7/11 1:36 PM, Jim Webber wrote: > Hi Antriani, > >> Ok, but the REST API doesn't produce more network overhead (i.e. >> HTTP...) compared to a driver implementation using sockets for access >> for example MySQL JDBC ? > I have no data to support this, but I'm going to make an educated guess and > say that the MySQL JDBC driver is overall faster than our REST API :-) > > But my point stands: measure your system, not its components. > > Neo4j might well have a slower network API than MySQL, but you might find > that because of the data model, you ship less data over the network, or the > queries run so much faster that network differences become negligible. > > Something will be your bottleneck in either the Neo4j case or the MySQL case, > but if the Neo4j case is faster despite having a slower network interface, > then you might not care. > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
