1. That's why i left the old method in, to each to his own. Until the old methods are left untouched, i think we can safely experiment without breaking anyone's code. As for the 'get' thing, i wouldn't call it a get operation, it is an explicit function call:
>>> n.connects_to(m) If it's clearly documented, i see no issues with having both methods in though. 2. I'd probably use get/set item functions for accessing properties too. That way if my proposal for relationships stays in, we won't be having any problems with relationship and property names overlap. While I do understand your reason for such API, i wanted to make things a little bit simpler for beginners like me. Since my work relies heavily on py2neo i want to make it as pleasant as possible. I will be submitting my modifications for your review, and in the meantime we'll see how others react to this. _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
