Yes. However, before that you will probably run into other limitations, like file sizes, IO and RAM. That is why we are a bit careful about just going to Longs or UUIDs.
Anything you are thinking of in particular? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:55 PM, bm3780 <bm3...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've read that Neo4j has data capacity limitations > (http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/milestone/capabilities-capacity.html). I > would like to confirm my understandings that the node, properties, and > relationships limitations are for each type (e.g. AND condition), not an > either/or (e.g. OR condition). > > Neo4j can hold: > * ~34 billions nodes, AND > * ~34 billion relationships, AND > * ~68 billion properties > > So I could theoretically have a single graph with 34 billion nodes, where > each node had two properties and a single relationship. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Data-Capacities-tp3533552p3533552.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
