Shouldn't rel2 then be an optional relationship? Otherwise IMHO it can never be null.
> START c=... > MATCH c-[rel1:MyRel]->a, c-[rel2?:MyRel]->b > WHERE rel2 is null > RETURN c Am 29.11.2011 um 13:00 schrieb D. Frej: > I would recommend the following > > START c=... > MATCH c-[rel1:MyRel]->a, c-[rel2:MyRel]->b > WHERE rel2 is null > RETURN c > > even though it seems it little strange > > > > Am 29.11.2011 03:03, schrieb KanTube: >> while not ideal you could do >> >> START >> a=node:node_auto_index(NodeType="A"),b=node:node_auto_index(NodeType="B") >> MATCH a-[:MyRel]->c<-[r?:MyRel]-b >> RETURN c, count(r) >> >> and in your code you could filter for count(r) = 0 >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/cypher-question-subqueries-possible-tp3543685p3544033.html >> Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
