+1 on doing a 1.13 release next. The 2.0 theme and features need to be fleshed out further before doing a major version change. The current theme for 1.13 looks good - looking forward to a productive release in the next 2 months.
Thanks, iR On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Thanks Ed for your offer to contribute. Are you interested in this JIRA: > > Support modern versions of gcc > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1025 > ? > Seems like a gap we should fill. > > > Looking thru the 2.0 JIRAs, the emerging themes seem to be: performance > improvements, more graph algorithms, misc feature improvements:. For e.g., > > [performance] > Add mini-batching to IGD framework > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1048 > > > [graph] > HITS > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1124 > > graph cut > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1074 > > > [feature impr] > k-NN distance functions > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1059 > > Neural nets grouping > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1149 > > > This seems reasonable to me, to have various different types of things > coming into 1.13 rather than a single theme . The mini-batching is > something I am excited about since it could help performance for a number > of different modules that use gradient descent. > > But I'll wait till next week to get more comments from the community > before making any version changes. > > Frank > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I like the idea of not rushing the Apache MADlib v2.0 and giving the new >> interface time to sufficiently bake. Beyond the three items marked >> resolved >> for v2.0, do we have a sense of what the theme will be for MADlib v1.13? >> >> Current items targeted with v2.0: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MADLIB/versions/12333619 >> >> FYI: I'm looking for ways to contribute to v1.13! >> >> -=e >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io> >> wrote: >> >> > MADlib community, >> > >> > tl;dr >> > >> > Proposing we do a 1.13 release in Nov before Thanksgiving, and a 2.0 >> after >> > that around Jan. >> > >> > >> > More >> > >> > The next release is currently numbered 2.0 as per current JIRAs, which >> > includes interface changes >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1157 >> > >> > Because of the interface changes, the 2.0 release is not backward >> > compatibility as per semantic versioning that Apache MADlib follows >> > http://semver.org/ >> > >> > We have started a couple of wiki pages to discuss ideas for the new 2.0 >> > interface: >> > >> > Ideas >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface >> +2.0+-+Ideas >> > IO standardization >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface+2.0+-+IO+ >> > Standardization >> > >> > but it is not baked yet. So I am wondering if we ought to do a 1.13 in >> Nov >> > before Thanksgiving to give us more time to collectively make a plan on >> the >> > interface, which would go in 2.0 around Jan or so. >> > >> > Please let me know what you think, and also comment/add/subtract on >> what’s >> > proposed for the interface changes. >> > >> > Frank >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> *Ed Espino* >> > >
