Thank you for your responses. It sounds like folks are OK with the proposal for 1.13 vs. 2.0. Therefore, I will create a 1.13 release and start splitting up the JIRAs.
Frank On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Nandish Jayaram <njaya...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Doing a 1.13 release sounds good. Backward compatibility breaking > Interface changes require more discussion as suggested. > +1 > > NJ > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Jingyi Mei <j...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> +1 on the 1.13 release. We can add our new features that don't require >> interface change to 1.13, and take more time for 2.0 features/interface >> change. Looking forward to new features and feature improvement in 1.13! >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Rashmi Raghu <rra...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >>> +1 on the 1.13 release. >>> It would be good to take the time for more feedback on 2.0 features / >>> interface change since there won't be any backward compatibility. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rashmi >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Rahul Iyer <ri...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 on doing a 1.13 release next. The 2.0 theme and features need to be >>>> fleshed out further before doing a major version change. >>>> The current theme for 1.13 looks good - looking forward to a productive >>>> release in the next 2 months. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> iR >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Ed for your offer to contribute. Are you interested in this >>>>> JIRA: >>>>> >>>>> Support modern versions of gcc >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1025 >>>>> ? >>>>> Seems like a gap we should fill. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Looking thru the 2.0 JIRAs, the emerging themes seem to be: >>>>> performance improvements, more graph algorithms, misc feature >>>>> improvements:. For e.g., >>>>> >>>>> [performance] >>>>> Add mini-batching to IGD framework >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1048 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [graph] >>>>> HITS >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1124 >>>>> >>>>> graph cut >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1074 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [feature impr] >>>>> k-NN distance functions >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1059 >>>>> >>>>> Neural nets grouping >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1149 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This seems reasonable to me, to have various different types of things >>>>> coming into 1.13 rather than a single theme . The mini-batching is >>>>> something I am excited about since it could help performance for a number >>>>> of different modules that use gradient descent. >>>>> >>>>> But I'll wait till next week to get more comments from the community >>>>> before making any version changes. >>>>> >>>>> Frank >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I like the idea of not rushing the Apache MADlib v2.0 and giving the >>>>>> new >>>>>> interface time to sufficiently bake. Beyond the three items marked >>>>>> resolved >>>>>> for v2.0, do we have a sense of what the theme will be for MADlib >>>>>> v1.13? >>>>>> >>>>>> Current items targeted with v2.0: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MADLIB/versions/12333619 >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI: I'm looking for ways to contribute to v1.13! >>>>>> >>>>>> -=e >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Frank McQuillan < >>>>>> fmcquil...@pivotal.io> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > MADlib community, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > tl;dr >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Proposing we do a 1.13 release in Nov before Thanksgiving, and a >>>>>> 2.0 after >>>>>> > that around Jan. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > More >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The next release is currently numbered 2.0 as per current JIRAs, >>>>>> which >>>>>> > includes interface changes >>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1157 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Because of the interface changes, the 2.0 release is not backward >>>>>> > compatibility as per semantic versioning that Apache MADlib follows >>>>>> > http://semver.org/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > We have started a couple of wiki pages to discuss ideas for the new >>>>>> 2.0 >>>>>> > interface: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Ideas >>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface >>>>>> +2.0+-+Ideas >>>>>> > IO standardization >>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface >>>>>> +2.0+-+IO+ >>>>>> > Standardization >>>>>> > >>>>>> > but it is not baked yet. So I am wondering if we ought to do a >>>>>> 1.13 in Nov >>>>>> > before Thanksgiving to give us more time to collectively make a >>>>>> plan on the >>>>>> > interface, which would go in 2.0 around Jan or so. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please let me know what you think, and also comment/add/subtract on >>>>>> what’s >>>>>> > proposed for the interface changes. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Frank >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Ed Espino* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rashmi Raghu, Ph.D. >>> Pivotal Data Science >>> >> >> >
