I agree it is not very friendly. Impossible to tell the correct value in
the options section processing. It needs to be >= than the actual number
of unique terms in the corpus and that is hard to anticipate though I
think it is known in seq2sparse. If it turns out to be the dictionary
size (I'm investigating), then it could be computed by adding a
dictionary path argument instead of the current option. Trouble with
that is the dictionary is not needed for anything else by LDA.
On 5/23/10 9:38 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
Is there a way to catch that with a more descriptive error earlier? I always
think AIOOBE looks bad.
On May 23, 2010 4:11 PM, "Jeff Eastman"<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, your -numWords option is set too low and that's causing the array
exception. Try -v 50000.
On 5/23/10 3:20 AM, 杨杰 wrote:
Jeff and Robin,
Thank you for your suggestion! There is anot...
