What happens if the number is too large? Is this a dense matrix we are talking about?
Would it work to make it a random access sparse matrix with very, very large bounds? On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]>wrote: > I agree it is not very friendly. Impossible to tell the correct value in > the options section processing. It needs to be >= than the actual number of > unique terms in the corpus and that is hard to anticipate though I think it > is known in seq2sparse. If it turns out to be the dictionary size (I'm > investigating), then it could be computed by adding a dictionary path > argument instead of the current option. Trouble with that is the dictionary > is not needed for anything else by LDA. > > On 5/23/10 9:38 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > >> Is there a way to catch that with a more descriptive error earlier? I >> always >> think AIOOBE looks bad. >> >> On May 23, 2010 4:11 PM, "Jeff Eastman"<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Yes, your -numWords option is set too low and that's causing the array >> exception. Try -v 50000. >> >> >> >> On 5/23/10 3:20 AM, 杨杰 wrote: >> >> >>> Jeff and Robin, >>> >>> Thank you for your suggestion! There is anot... >>> >>> >> >> > >
