Cool. I will check it out. Quick question... Has CONNECTORS-1089 been merged into the dev_1x branch? I am interested in the document security with JDBC support in conjunction with this.
Alejandro On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > A fix is available and is attached to the ticket. Alternatively, you can > check out the dev_1x branch or trunk. Please be aware that the schema for > dev_1x and trunk has changed, so unless you are using the single-process > example on the dev_1x branch, you will need to think about upgrade. > > Thanks > Karl > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Alejandro, >> This is a problem with JDBC authority caching. See CONNECTORS-1109. >> I'll have a fix available shortly. >> >> Karl >> >> >
