It has been merged, yes. Karl
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Alejandro Calbazana <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool. I will check it out. Quick question... Has CONNECTORS-1089 been > merged into the dev_1x branch? I am interested in the document security > with JDBC support in conjunction with this. > > Alejandro > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A fix is available and is attached to the ticket. Alternatively, you can >> check out the dev_1x branch or trunk. Please be aware that the schema for >> dev_1x and trunk has changed, so unless you are using the single-process >> example on the dev_1x branch, you will need to think about upgrade. >> >> Thanks >> Karl >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alejandro, >>> This is a problem with JDBC authority caching. See CONNECTORS-1109. >>> I'll have a fix available shortly. >>> >>> Karl >>> >>> >> >
