This is def interesting for us as this is a problem we are facing too.

But just to clarify, what is the advantage of this approach over
submitting Docker build jobs to either the Chronos or Jenkins
schedulers?  For our use case, we were thinking about writing a
scheduler for GoCD (which we use for CI/CD) to work much in the same
way as the existing Jenkins scheduler.

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Joe Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 to a registry, stuff like NPM, vagrantcloud, and docker make it very
> clean to search (but seems like it takes more work to support and setup).
>
> Tom- this is rad! Also loving the use of Pesos- definitely looking forward
> to to more contributors there :)
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Just an idea but I think we should strive to provide a better approach
>> that is more scalable/searchable IMHO as the number of frameworks continue
>> to grow. I created an issue here to discuss potential options and if people
>> are interested in providing some type of framework registry:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1759
>>
>> I see a couple options that could be interested, either the more lax
>> community driven approach that JenkinsCI does via a GitHub organization or
>> building a web-based registry similar to what the docker/ansible folks have
>> done.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is great Tom. Thanks for sharing. We do list Mesos frameworks on the
>>> website (http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/mesos-frameworks/).
>>> Please send a PR or RB request.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Tom Arnfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @Ankur Wups! That's silly of me...
>>>> http://github.com/duedil-ltd/portainer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 September 2014 23:45, Ankur Chauhan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you share a link to the repo?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Tom Arnfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thought it would be worth sharing this on the mailing list. We've
>>>>>> recently open sourced a Mesos framework called Portainer, which is for
>>>>>> building docker containers on top of your cluster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is in working order, though very early stage... It supports all
>>>>>> Dockerfile instructions (including ADD) and can build multiple images in
>>>>>> parallel. It's written entirely in Python, and is also built upon the 
>>>>>> Pesos
>>>>>> python framework API @wickman, @nekto0n and I have been working on, so
>>>>>> there's no need to install libmesos to use the framework.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I ended up trying out the idea because we've had a painful experience
>>>>>> managing dedicated infrastructure for building all of our images, which 
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> sure some of you can empathise with, and figured we could leverage the 
>>>>>> spare
>>>>>> capacity on our new Mesos cluster to cut that out entirely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We'd love any feedback or suggestions, as well as any contributions!
>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing what you all think. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Side note... It would be great if there were a place we could list all
>>>>>> of the known frameworks for users to explore, maybe this already exists?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom (and the rest of the infra team at DueDil).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Chris Aniszczyk | Open Source | Twitter, Inc.
>> @cra | +1 512 961 6719
>
>

Reply via email to